Go Back   Mazda 6 Forums : Mazda 6 / Mazda Atenza Forum > Technical / Performance / Model > Mazda6 1st Generation (2002-2008) > Wheels / Tires

Mazda6club.com is the premier Mazda 6 / Atenza Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-21-2007, 12:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Track Racer
 
yellowmp5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i j/ swapped out my 18" MS6 wheels + 215/45/18 Pirelli P Nero Zero M+S with powdercoated 18" RX-8 + 235/40/18 Falken ZE912
accordin' to my research:

MS6 wheels = 23.5 lbs
215/45/18 Pirelli = 23 lbs
net total = +/-46.5 lbs

RX=8 Wheels = 22.6 lbs
235/40/18 ZE912 = 26.8 lbs
net total = +/-49.4 lbs

roughly 3lbs gained per corner...


i found accelerating is j/ a bit slugglish.....so is it j/ me, or that 3lbs/corner does make a different....
will i see a significant sign of MPG decrease? Pre-mature brake pads? etc?
yellowmp5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Old 07-21-2007, 01:00 AM   #2 (permalink)
GGG
Track Racer
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Could have sworn that the RX-8 wheels were 2lbs lighter (per rim) - would be about the same with the wider/heavier tyres...



Quote:
i j/ swapped out my 18" MS6 wheels + 215/45/18 Pirelli P Nero Zero M+S with powdercoated 18" RX-8 + 235/40/18 Falken ZE912
accordin' to my research:

MS6 wheels = 23.5 lbs
215/45/18 Pirelli = 23 lbs
net total = +/-46.5 lbs

RX=8 Wheels = 22.6 lbs
235/40/18 ZE912 = 26.8 lbs
net total = +/-49.4 lbs

roughly 3lbs gained per corner...
i found accelerating is j/ a bit slugglish.....so is it j/ me, or that 3lbs/corner does make a different....
will i see a significant sign of MPG decrease? Pre-mature brake pads? etc?[/b]
__________________
AutoExe Replica CF grille, TXS BPV, Apexi SRI, Kings Springs (30mm drop), RX8 wheels or Enkei RPM2 (depending on my mood), SLS test pipe, 3.25" ETS TMIC and my trusty V1
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 02:43 AM   #3 (permalink)
Track Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 924
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i would imagine, as with any additional weight, your accel will dimish.. overall though, you kinda have to decide what you want... i mean your giving up 12 pounds but gaining 20mm of rubber per corner.. if you auto-x this might mean alot. I'm not an avid auto-x'er so I wont begin to get into how 235's are better than 215's and so on and so forth. i'll leave that for one of the experts...

you could always keep the 235's and run some forged 18x8's rims. that would give you the advantage of the 235's and some weight reduction over the stock rims...

good luck
__________________
2005 Mazda 6i Steel Grey - Magnaflow Catback, Airbox Mod, more to come
[x] Cat Back Exhaust
[x] Cold Air Intake
[x] Non Sport Appearance Package
[x] TEIN S-Techs
[x] Nex-O M-20's 18x7.5 w/ Yokohama AVS ES100's
[ ] Vibrant Header

1991 Eagle Talon TSi AWD - 11.467 @ 121.460 MPH stroked + GT42R
[x]DONE!!!
HawaiianEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 08:48 AM   #4 (permalink)
Rally Racer
 
posttosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Very Near to the Center of the Known Universe
Posts: 1,430
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
your giving up 12 pounds but gaining 20mm of rubber per corner.. if you auto-x this might mean alot.[/b]
Assuming that the tires are inflated to the same pressure, the size of the contact patch of a 235/40R18 tire is the same as the size of the contact patch of a 215/45R18 tire. The only way to increase the size of the contact patch is to decrease the pressure, but that has other effects, not all of them desirable.
posttosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 11:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
Track Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 924
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Assuming that the tires are inflated to the same pressure, the size of the contact patch of a 235/40R18 tire is the same as the size of the contact patch of a 215/45R18 tire. The only way to increase the size of the contact patch is to decrease the pressure, but that has other effects, not all of them desirable.[/b]
how is that possible... a 215mm wide tire having the same size contact patch as a 235mm wide tire..... so does a 195mm tire have the same contact patch as a 335mm tire? given the same air pressure of course...
__________________
2005 Mazda 6i Steel Grey - Magnaflow Catback, Airbox Mod, more to come
[x] Cat Back Exhaust
[x] Cold Air Intake
[x] Non Sport Appearance Package
[x] TEIN S-Techs
[x] Nex-O M-20's 18x7.5 w/ Yokohama AVS ES100's
[ ] Vibrant Header

1991 Eagle Talon TSi AWD - 11.467 @ 121.460 MPH stroked + GT42R
[x]DONE!!!
HawaiianEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 11:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
Rally Racer
 
posttosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Very Near to the Center of the Known Universe
Posts: 1,430
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
how is that possible... a 215mm wide tire having the same size contact patch as a 235mm wide tire..... so does a 195mm tire have the same contact patch as a 335mm tire? given the same air pressure of course...[/b]
Yes. The shape of the contact patch is different for the different width tires, but the effective area is the same size. (This assumes that there is relatively even pressure across the area of the contact patch, which is never fully achieved, but which all tire designers strive for.)
posttosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Track Racer
 
Owen Birch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 344
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Yes. The shape of the contact patch is different for the different width tires, but the effective area is the same size. (This assumes that there is relatively even pressure across the area of the contact patch, which is never fully achieved, but which all tire designers strive for.)[/b]

duh, what?!?

so a 215 VS a 235 has the same contact area? Oh, please do explain this one in great detail...
__________________
2006 Titanium Gray MS6
MB Boost 18" with Goodyear Eagle F1 All Season
Dashhawk
SPC Balljoints -1 Camber front, -1.5 Camber rear. 0.0 Toe
Owen Birch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
Rally Racer
 
posttosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Very Near to the Center of the Known Universe
Posts: 1,430
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
duh, what?!?

so a 215 VS a 235 has the same contact area? Oh, please do explain this one in great detail...[/b]
I'll let Chris Longhurst, author of the Wheel and Tire Bible, do it for me. (Scroll down, or use text search, to the subsection headed: "Fat or thin? The question of contact patches and grip.")
Or, if you would rather get your information from Mazda6tech.com, see here.
posttosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 01:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Track Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 924
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i've yet to read the technical babble, but before i do i'm going to write to john force and tell him to run 15x5's out back instead of the usual 15x16's... since it's the same contact patch as long as the air pressure is the same


ok i read the brain smokin techie talk and i've gathered that the contact patch is the same in widths close in size (215 vs 235) but at some point the wide and skinny patch of the wider tire will over come the narrow and fat patch of the more narrow tire... good info post...
__________________
2005 Mazda 6i Steel Grey - Magnaflow Catback, Airbox Mod, more to come
[x] Cat Back Exhaust
[x] Cold Air Intake
[x] Non Sport Appearance Package
[x] TEIN S-Techs
[x] Nex-O M-20's 18x7.5 w/ Yokohama AVS ES100's
[ ] Vibrant Header

1991 Eagle Talon TSi AWD - 11.467 @ 121.460 MPH stroked + GT42R
[x]DONE!!!
HawaiianEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 04:57 PM   #10 (permalink)
Rally Racer
 
posttosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Very Near to the Center of the Known Universe
Posts: 1,430
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
i've yet to read the technical babble, but before i do i'm going to write to john force and tell him to run 15x5's out back instead of the usual 15x16's... since it's the same contact patch as long as the air pressure is the same [/b]
Actually controlled tests of that nature (not that extreme, obviously) have been done, and the results were not what you might expect: Big wheels and tires vs. smaller wheels and tires

Quote:
ok i read the brain smokin techie talk and i've gathered that the contact patch is the same in widths close in size (215 vs 235) but at some point the wide and skinny patch of the wider tire will over come the narrow and fat patch of the more narrow tire.[/b]
I don't see where you got the last part. The area where a wider tire may have a performance advantage usually relates to the behavior of the sidewall (and transition zone between the sidewall and tread) rather than in the contact patch. For the same reason that high-end phonograph stylii had (have) elliptical rather than round diamond tips where the stylus meets the groove, a wider-but-shorter contact patch has less resistance to being deflected from a straight line rotation than a narrower but longer contact patch does. That means that -- everything else being equal -- a wider tire will feel lighter and quicker through the steering wheel (at speed) than a narrower tire, but it also means that the wider tire is more subject to deflection by small road irregularities, requiring more micro steering adjustments, than a narrower tire.
posttosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2