QUOTE (Dr. Bob @ Aug 7 2008, 11:57 AM)

Yeah, the XL refers more to the stiffness of the sidewall and inflation pressure than it does the load rating. The 91 rated, XL 225-45 General tire probably should be run at a higher inflation pressure than the stock tire (say 40-41# rather than 38) but otherwise appears to be working well and wearing fine on my car. And since it cost less than 1/3 of the RE050, even if it wears a little faster it'll save me money. No perceptible difference in dry weather performance and actually better performance than the stockers in the rain. I run the summer tires on RX8 wheels and the winter Blizzaks on the stock wheels (also in 225-45 because I can run the higher performance Blizzaks in that size vs only the W series in 215-45).
Why would you run a higher pressure with a 91 load rated 225/45 tire? A 215/45 93XL @ 38PSI holds 1314lbs. A 225/45 91SL tire holds the same weight at 35PSI. As for sidewall stiffness, I disagree. The Potenza S-03's I have are 91SL and the sidewalls are noticeably stiffer than the stock 93XL RE050A's. I personally think the load rating has more to do with the load the tire carries at a given pressure than sidewall stiffness...hence the term load rating.
QUOTE (posttosh @ Aug 6 2008, 10:27 PM)

The XL designation (not a "rating") does not mean what you probably think it means. At any given inflation pressure that is approved for a 91 or 93 load index tire, a 91XL or 93XL tire actually will have a lower load capacity than a standard load (SL) 91 or 93 load index tire.
That said, any tire that has a load index lower than 91 (SL or XL) should not be fitted to a Mazda6.
Isn't the main difference between SL and XL ratings that the XL's can increase their load capacity past 35PSI to 41PSI while the SL's top out at 35PSI?
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/tirespecskey.jsp